4.7 Article

Coevolution of venom function and venom resistance in a rattlesnake predator and its squirrel prey

Journal

Publisher

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2015.2841

Keywords

coevolution; local adaptation; venom; resistance; molecular variation; predator-prey interactions

Funding

  1. NSF GRF
  2. American Society of Naturalists
  3. Herpetologists' League
  4. American Museum of Natural History
  5. American Society of Mammalogists
  6. California Bureau of Land Management
  7. Sigma Xi
  8. American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists
  9. Chicago Herpetological Society
  10. Ohio State University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Measuring local adaptation can provide insights into how coevolution occurs between predators and prey. Specifically, theory predicts that local adaptation in functionally matched traits of predators and prey will not be detected when coevolution is governed by escalating arms races, whereas it will be present when coevolution occurs through an alternate mechanism of phenotype matching. Here, we analyse local adaptation in venom activity and prey resistance across 12 populations of Northern Pacific rattle snakes and California ground squirrels, an interaction that has often been described as an arms race. Assays of venom function and squirrel resistance show substantial geographical variation (influenced by site elevation) in both venom metalloproteinase activity and resistance factor effectiveness. We demonstrate local adaptation in the effectiveness of rattlesnake venom to overcoming present squirrel resistance, suggesting that phenotype matching plays a role in the coevolution of these molecular traits. Further, the predator was the locally adapted antagonist in this interaction, arguing that rattlesnakes are evolutionarily ahead of their squirrel prey. Phenotype matching needs to be considered as an important mechanism influencing coevolution between venomous animals and resistant prey.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available