4.7 Article

Longitudinal associations of active commuting with wellbeing and sickness absence

Journal

PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
Volume 84, Issue -, Pages 19-26

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.12.010

Keywords

Adult; Health Status; Psychological; Motor Activity; Walking; Transportation; Absenteeism; Epidemiology; Sick Leave; Bicycling

Funding

  1. Centre for Diet and Activity Research (CEDAR)
  2. UKCRC Public Health Research Centre of Excellence
  3. Economic and Social Research Council, Medical Research Council
  4. National Institute for Health Research
  5. Wellcome Trust
  6. UK Clinical Research Collaboration
  7. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Public Health Research programme [09/3001/06]
  8. Medical Research Council
  9. Oliver Mytton by a Welcome Trust clinical doctoral fellowship
  10. ESRC [ES/G007462/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  11. MRC [MC_UU_12015/6, MR/K023187/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  12. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/G007462/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  13. Medical Research Council [MC_UU_12015/6, MR/K023187/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  14. National Institute for Health Research [PDF-2012-05-157, 09/3001/06] Funding Source: researchfish
  15. National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR) [PDF-2012-05-157] Funding Source: National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective. Our aim was to explore longitudinal associations of active commuting (cycling to work and walking to work) with physical wellbeing (PCS-8), mental wellbeing (MCS-8) and sickness absence. Method. We used data from the Commuting and Health in Cambridge study (2009 to 2012; n=801) to test associations between: a) maintenance of cycling (or walking) to work over a one year period and indices of wellbeing at the end of that one year period; and b) associations between change in cycling (or walking) to work and change in indices of wellbeing. Linear regression was used for testing associations with PCS-8 and MCS-8, and negative binomial regression for sickness absence. Results. After adjusting for sociodemographic variables, physical activity and physical limitation, those who maintained cycle commuting reported lower sickness absence (0.46, 95% CI: 0.14-0.80; equivalent to one less day per year) and higher MCS-8 scores (1.50, 0.10-2.10) than those who did not cycle to work. The association for sickness absence persisted after adjustment for baseline sickness absence. No significant associations were observed for PCS-8. Associations between change in cycle commuting and change in indices of wellbeing were not significant. No significant associations were observed for walking. Conclusions. This work provides some evidence of the value of cycle commuting in improving or maintaining the health and wellbeing of adults of working age. This may be important in engaging employers in the promotion of active travel and communicating the benefits of active travel to employees. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available