4.7 Article

Honeycomb structured porous films prepared from arborescent graft polystyrenes via the breath figures method

Journal

POLYMER
Volume 107, Issue -, Pages 273-281

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2016.11.032

Keywords

Breath figures; Arborescent graft polymer; CNT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Highly ordered honeycomb films were produced from arborescent graft polystyrene (AGPS) solutions using breath figures (BF). The structure of the BF pattern (whether single layered or multilayered) of pores depended on several factors such as the type of solvent used (CS2 or CHCl3), the length of the side chains, the generation number and the concentration of the polymer. When solutions of AGPS with shorter side chains (M-w similar to 5000 g/mol) were used for the BF process, arborescent polymers generated a multilayer pore structure. However, when polymers with longer side chains (M-w similar to 30,000 g/mol) were used, monolayer pore structures were mostly generated. The regularity and surface quality of the honeycomb pattern became worsened as the multilayered structures formed. The polymer concentration (phi) also played a critical role in determining the morphology of the BF films. Higher f led to a multilayer pore structure while lower f resulted in a monolayer pore structure. In general, the regularity of top layer pores was found to decrease with increasing generation number. The introduction of multiwall carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) into AGPS solutions and application of the BF process using the solution blends yielded patterned hybrid films. SEM images showed that some CNTs were loaded into the honeycomb pattern of AGPS, but that most MWCNTs precipitated to form the bottom layer. In this work, the influence of concentration and surface modification of MWCNTs on the BF patterns obtained is discussed. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available