4.7 Article

Physiological and biochemical characterization of two Amaranthus species under Cr(VI) stress differing in Cr(VI) tolerance

Journal

PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 108, Issue -, Pages 12-23

Publisher

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2016.06.030

Keywords

Chromium accumulation; Photochemistry of photosystem II; Oxidative stress; Antioxidant defense system

Categories

Funding

  1. Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India
  2. University Grants Commission, New Delhi

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present study was undertaken to evaluate Cr(VI) toxicity tolerance in two Amaranthus species viz. Amaranthus viridis and Amaranthus cruentus exposed to hexavalent chromium [Cr(VI)] stress. To ascertain this, both Amaranthus species were grown under various concentrations (0,10 and 50 mu M) of Cr(VI) in the hydroponic system. After 7 days of Cr(VI) treatment, various traits such as growth, Cr accumulation, photochemistry of photosystem II (PS II) (JIP-test), oxidative stress and antioxidant defense system were analyzed. Cr(VI) treatments caused inhibition in growth and PS II photochemistry, which was accompanied with increased accumulation of Cr that results into enhanced generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS): O-2(center dot-) and H2O2, which subsequently induced the peroxidation of lipids and leakage of electrolyte in both the Amaranthus species. Cr(VI) accumulation, lipid peroxidation and electrolyte leakage were more pronounced in A. viridis than in A. cruentus. On the other hand, A. cruentus seedlings showed higher activities of enzymatic antioxidants: SOD, POD, CAT and GST, and non-enzymatic antioxidants: cysteine and non-protein thiols (NP-SH) levels than A. viridis. The overall results suggest that A. cruentus is more tolerant than A. viridis due to its higher antioxidant defense system that protected seedlings under Cr(VI) stress. (C) 2016 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available