4.8 Article

Functional Analysis of Cellulose Synthase (CESA) Protein Class Specificity

Journal

PLANT PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 173, Issue 2, Pages 970-983

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1104/pp.16.01642

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/H012923/1]
  2. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/C511064/1, BB/H012923/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. BBSRC [BB/H012923/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The cellulose synthase complex (CSC) exhibits a 6-fold symmetry and is known as a rosette. Each CSC is believed to contain between 18 and 24 CESA proteins that each synthesize an individual glucan chain. These chains form the microfibrils that confer the remarkable structural properties of cellulose. At least three different classes of CESA proteins are essential to form the CSC. However, while organization of the CSC determines microfibril structure, how individual CESA proteins are organized within the CSC remains unclear. Parts of the plant CESA proteins map sufficiently well onto the bacterial CESA (BcsA) structure, indicating that they are likely to share a common catalytic mechanism. However, plant CESA proteins are much larger than the bacterial BcsA protein, prompting the suggestion that these plant-specific regions are important for interactions between CESA proteins and for conferring CESA class specificity. In this study, we have undertaken a comprehensive analysis of well-defined regions of secondary cell wall CESA proteins, with the aim of defining what distinguishes different CESA proteins and hence what determines the specificity of each CESA class. Our results demonstrate that CESA class specificity extends throughout the protein and not just in the highly variable regions. Furthermore, we find that different CESA isoforms vary greatly in their levels of site specificity and this is likely to be determined by the constraints imposed by their position within the CSC rather than their primary structure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available