4.7 Article

Monilinia Species Associated with Brown Rot of Cultivated Apple and Pear Fruit in China

Journal

PLANT DISEASE
Volume 100, Issue 11, Pages 2240-2250

Publisher

AMER PHYTOPATHOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1094/PDIS-03-16-0325-RE

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31201469]
  2. Earmarked Fund for Modern Agro-industry Technology Research System [CARS-28]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Monilinia isolates were collected from major apple and pear production regions in China from 2004 to 2011 and identified based on their morphological characteristics and three highly conserved loci. The 247 isolates belonged to three species: Monilinia fructicola, Monilia yunnanensis, and Monilia polystroma. M. yunnanensis was the most prevalent (77%), followed by M. polystroma (20%) and Monilinia fructicola (3%). Monilia yunnanensis is primarily distributed in the south, north, and west of China; M. polystroma is limited to the north and east; and Monilinia fructicola was detected only from a few samples from the north and east. Phylogenetic analysis based on internal transcribed spacer, beta-tubulin, and laccase (lcc2) genes suggested that Monilia yunnanensis, M. polystroma, and Monilinia fructigena are closely related, and Monilia yunnanensis is more distantly related. We also found that these three species do not show consistent differences in morphological characteristics, including colony morphology, colony expansion rate, conidial characteristics, and the amount of stroma produced in culture. Thus, these three species are more like phylogenetic species in the process of speciation. In addition, a set of species-specific primers based on single-nucleotide polymorphisms and deletions in the lcc2 gene region were designed and a conventional polymerase chain reaction method successfully developed for differentiating Monilinia fructicola, Monilia yunnanensis, M. polystroma, and Monilinia laxa from the other species.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available