4.5 Article

Variables Associated with Severity of Bacterial Canker and Wilt Caused by Clavibacter michiganensis subsp michiganensis in Tomato Greenhouses

Journal

PHYTOPATHOLOGY
Volume 106, Issue 3, Pages 254-261

Publisher

AMER PHYTOPATHOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1094/PHYTO-07-15-0159-R

Keywords

geostatistics; hierarchical partitioning; Solanum lycopersicum

Categories

Funding

  1. Israeli Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development
  2. Israeli Plants Production & Marketing board

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis, the causal agent of bacterial canker and wilt of tomato, is considered to be one of the most important bacterial pathogens worldwide. In the year 2000 there was an increase in the number of infected greenhouses and in the severity of the disease in Israel. As part of the effort to cope with the disease, a comprehensive survey was conducted. Scouts recorded disease severity monthly in 681 production units. At the end of the season the scouts met with the growers and together recorded relevant details about the crop and cultural practices employed. The results suggested an absence of anisotropy pattern in the study region. Global Moran's I analysis showed that disease severity had significant spatial autocorrelation. The strongest spatial autocorrelation occurred within a 1,500 m neighborhood, which is comparable to the distance between production units maintained by one grower (Farm). Next, we tested three groups of variables including or excluding the Farm as a variable. When the Farm was included the explained variation increased in all the studied models. Overall, results of this study demonstrate that the most influential factor on bacterial canker severity was the Farm. This variable probably encompasses variation in experience, differences in agricultural practices between growers, and the quality of implementation of management practices.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available