4.5 Article

Relationship between daily fluctuations of body temperature and the processing of sub-second intervals

Journal

PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR
Volume 164, Issue -, Pages 220-226

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.06.008

Keywords

Body temperature; Spontaneous tempo; Sub-second intervals; Time discrimination; Time reproduction; Finger tapping

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) [RGPIN-2016-05028]
  2. NSERC Summer Scholarship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In 1933, Hoagland proposed that temporal processing was based on an internal clock controlled by a temperature-dependent chemical pacemaker. Several studies have tested this hypothesis, mainly using intervals above 1 s, and the global picture about the impact of temperature remains unclear. The present study aims to investigate the relationship between daily fluctuations of body temperature and the processing of sub-second intervals. In a within-subject design, twelve university students performed a finger tapping task, a time reproduction task, and a time discrimination task at three different time of the day, 9 am, 1 pm and 5 pm, and using four sub-seconds intervals (450, 550, 650 and 750 ms). As expected, we observed different degrees of body temperature across the time of the day, with the lower temperature recorded in the morning and the higher in the late afternoon. Results showed that temporal performances were independent of body temperature, regardless of the temporal task used and of the standard interval tested, indicating that performances within the same temporal task were consistent across different temperature levels. Our study provides evidence that the abilities for processing very brief intervals are reliable across the time of the day and are not modulated by the body temperature. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available