4.5 Article

Blood transcriptional signature of recombinant human erythropoietin administration and implications for antidoping strategies

Journal

PHYSIOLOGICAL GENOMICS
Volume 48, Issue 3, Pages 202-209

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00108.2015

Keywords

blood doping; erythropoiesis; mRNA

Funding

  1. national scholarship program Kristjan Jaak - Archimedes Foundation
  2. Ministry of Education and Research
  3. European Social Fund's Doctoral Studies and Internationalisation Programme DoRa
  4. WADA [08C19YP]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) is frequently abused by athletes as a performance-enhancing drug, despite being prohibited by the World AntiDoping Agency. Although the methods to detect blood doping, including rHuEPO injections, have improved in recent years, they remain imperfect. In a proof-of-principle study, we identified, replicated, and validated the whole blood transcriptional signature of rHuEPO in endurance-trained Caucasian males at sea level (n = 18) and Kenyan endurance runners at moderate altitude (n = 20), all of whom received rHuEPO injections for 4 wk. Transcriptional profiling shows that hundreds of transcripts were altered by rHuEPO in both cohorts. The main regulated expression pattern, observed in all participants, was characterized by a rebound effect with a profound upregulation during rHuEPO and a subsequent downregulation up to 4 wk postadministration. The functions of the identified genes were mainly related to the functional and structural properties of the red blood cell. Of the genes identified to be differentially expressed during and post-rHuEPO, we further confirmed a whole blood 34-transcript signature that can distinguish between samples collected pre-, during, and post-rHuEPO administration. By providing biomarkers that can reveal rHuEPO use, our findings represent an advance in the development of new methods for the detection of blood doping.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available