4.6 Article

The effects of framework dynamics on the behavior of water adsorbed in the [Zn(l-L)(Cl)] and Co-MOF-74 metal-organic frameworks

Journal

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages 8196-8204

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5cp07681a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [DMR-1305101, ACI-1053575]
  2. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science [DE-FG02-13ER16387]
  3. National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center
  4. Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  5. Division Of Materials Research
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1305101] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effects of framework flexibility on the structural and dynamical properties of water adsorbed in two prototypical metal-organic frameworks are investigated through molecular dynamics simulations. It is found that water molecules in the pores of a flexible model of [Zn(l-L)(Cl)] exhibit slower dynamics than when the framework is artificially held rigid in the simulations. In contrast, the water dynamics in Co-MOF-74 is predicted to be accelerated by the framework vibrations. The origin of this different behavior directly relates to how water interacts with the two frameworks, which, in turn, determines different hydrogen-bond patterns in the pores. While the first water molecules adsorbed in [Zn(l-L)(Cl)] donate a single hydrogen bond to the Zn-Cl groups and point the other hydrogen atom towards the center of the pore, water molecules adsorbed in Co-MOF-74 initially bind to the cobalt atoms of the framework via their oxygen atoms, thus leaving each molecule free to form two hydrogen bonds with additional molecules adsorbed at higher loading. The simulation results indicate that taking into account the framework flexibility in computer simulations is necessary for a quantitative modeling of adsorption and transport processes in metal-organic frameworks.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available