4.7 Article

Solid-liquid separation method governs the in vitro bioaccessibility of metals in contaminated soil-like test materials

Journal

CHEMOSPHERE
Volume 134, Issue -, Pages 544-549

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.12.019

Keywords

Bioavailability; Centrifugation; Microfiltration; Ultrafiltration; PBET; IVG

Funding

  1. SDS' Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Discovery Grant

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An in vitro gastrointestinal model was used to explore the role of solid-liquid separation method on the bioaccessibility of trace elements in a smelter-impacted soil (NIST-2711) from Helena, MT and a mine overburden from an open-pit gold and silver mine in Mount Nansen, YK (YK-OVB). Separation methods studied included centrifugation (5000g, 12000g), syringe microfiltration (0.45 mu m), and ultrafiltration (1000 kDa, 50 kDa, 30 kDa, 10 kDa, 3 kDa). Results indicated that the use of syringe microfiltration generally yields the same bioaccessibility as the use of centrifugation and that the speed of centrifugation does not typically affect metal bioaccessibility. However, ultrafiltration consistently yields a significantly lower bioaccessibility than the use of centrifugation and syringe microfiltration. There are rarely any differences between bioaccessibility estimates generated using a low-resistance (1000 kDa) and a high-resistance (3 kDa) ultrafiltration membrane; therefore, under the in vitro gastrointestinal conditions modeled herein, negligible quantities of trace elements are complexed to small molecules between 3 and 1000 IcDa. The primary exceptions to these trends were observed for Pb in NIST-2711 (5000g > 12000g > 0.45 mu m > ultrafiltration) and for Tl in NIST-2711 and YK-OVB (5000g similar to 12000g > 0.45 mu m > ultrafiltration). These results provide valuable information to researchers attempting to expand the use of in vitro bioaccessibility beyond soil Pb and As. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available