4.4 Article

PLGA nanoparticles for intravitreal peptide delivery: statistical optimization, characterization and toxicity evaluation

Journal

PHARMACEUTICAL DEVELOPMENT AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages 324-333

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10837450.2016.1240184

Keywords

Box-Behnken Design; drug delivery; ocular peptide delivery; PLGA nanoparticles; zebrafish embryo toxicity

Funding

  1. Health Research Council of New Zealand [10.13039/501100001505 [14/018]]
  2. University of Auckland [10.13039/501100001537]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Frequent intravitreal injections are currently used to overcome the ocular barriers and provide sufficient drug to the posterior eye segment. However, intravitreal injections have been associated with a number of complications and high treatment costs. To overcome these limitations, peptide-loaded poly(d,l-lactic-co-glycolic acid) nanoparticles (PLGA NPs) were developed using the nanoprecipitation technique and were optimized via Box-Behnken Design (BBD) and Response Surface Methodology (RSM). Developed NPs were evaluated for potential toxicity and cell apoptosis using the zebrafish embryo toxicity (ZET) model with titanium dioxide NPs and ethanol (1% v/v) serving as positive controls. Developed NPs had a size of 75.6-153.8nm, a polydispersity index between 0.11 and 0.25 and a zeta potential of -9.4 to -46.0mV. Loaded peptide was found to be stable under various experimental conditions tested. BBD and RSM were validated through the characterization of optimized formulations. Survival and hatching rates of NP-treated zebrafish 0-144h post-fertilization were found to be normal with no significant malformations. Cellular apoptosis studies also endorsed the non-cytotoxic nature of the NPs. The overall results indicate that optimized PLGA nanoparticles could be a promising platform for efficient peptide delivery to the posterior segment of the eye.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available