4.3 Article

Menstrual and Reproductive Factors, Hormone Use, and Risk of Pancreatic Cancer: Analysis From the International Pancreatic Cancer Case-Control Consortium (PanC4)

Journal

PANCREAS
Volume 45, Issue 10, Pages 1401-1410

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000000635

Keywords

pancreatic cancer; menstrual and reproductive factors; exogenous hormones; hysterectomy; consortium

Funding

  1. Red Tematica de Investigacion Cooperativa en Cancer (RTICC) [Rd06/0020/0091, Rd12/0036/0018]
  2. Generalitat de Catalunya
  3. Grant Agency of Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic [IGA MZ CR 8090-3, 9422-3]
  4. MH CZ - DRO (MMCI) [00209805]
  5. RECAMO [CZ. 1.05/2.1.00/03.0101]
  6. Italian Association for Cancer Research (AIRC) [10068]
  7. Italian Foundation for Cancer Research (FIRC)
  8. NIH [R01 CA098380]
  9. Prevention, Control, and Population Research Goldstein Award
  10. Society of MSKCC
  11. Geoffrey Beene Cancer Research Fund
  12. National Cancer Institute [CA059706, CA108370, CA109767, CA089726, CA098889]
  13. Rombauer Pancreatic Cancer Research Fund
  14. California Department of Public Health, the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program [N01-PC-35136]
  15. Cancer Research Society
  16. U.S. National Institute of Health [5R01 CA114421]
  17. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality
  18. Shanghai Cancer Institute [SB10-06]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives We aimed to evaluate the relation between menstrual and reproductive factors, exogenous hormones, and risk of pancreatic cancer (PC). Methods Eleven case-control studies within the International Pancreatic Cancer Case-control Consortium took part in the present study, including in total 2838 case and 4748 control women. Pooled estimates of odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a 2-step logistic regression model and adjusting for relevant covariates. Results An inverse OR was observed in women who reported having had hysterectomy (ORyesvs.no, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.67-0.91), remaining significant in postmenopausal women and never-smoking women, adjusted for potential PC confounders. A mutually adjusted model with the joint effect for hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and hysterectomy showed significant inverse associations with PC in women who reported having had hysterectomy with HRT use (OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.48-0.84). Conclusions Our large pooled analysis suggests that women who have had a hysterectomy may have reduced risk of PC. However, we cannot rule out that the reduced risk could be due to factors or indications for having had a hysterectomy. Further investigation of risk according to HRT use and reason for hysterectomy may be necessary.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available