4.5 Review

The role of calcium supplementation in healthy musculoskeletal ageing

Journal

OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL
Volume 28, Issue 2, Pages 447-462

Publisher

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s00198-016-3773-6

Keywords

Calcium supplementation; Fracture reduction; Myocardial infarction; Vitamin D supplementation

Funding

  1. European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ESCEO), a Belgian not-for-profit organisation
  2. Medical Research Council [MC_UU_12011/1, U1475000002, MC_UP_A620_1014, MC_U147585827, MC_U147585824, MC_UU_12011/2, MC_U147585819, U1475000001, MC_UP_A620_1015, G0400491] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0508-10082, NF-SI-0513-10085] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. MRC [MC_U147585819, G0400491, MC_UP_A620_1015, MC_UU_12011/2, MC_U147585827] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The place of calcium supplementation, with or without concomitant vitamin D supplementation, has been much debated in terms of both efficacy and safety. There have been numerous trials and meta-analyses of supplementation for fracture reduction, and associations with risk of myocardial infarction have been suggested in recent years. In this report, the product of an expert consensus meeting of the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ESCEO) and the International Foundation for Osteoporosis (IOF), we review the evidence for the value of calcium supplementation, with or without vitamin D supplementation, for healthy musculoskeletal ageing. We conclude that (1) calcium and vitamin D supplementation leads to a modest reduction in fracture risk, although population-level intervention has not been shown to be an effective public health strategy; (2) supplementation with calcium alone for fracture reduction is not supported by the literature; (3) side effects of calcium supplementation include renal stones and gastrointestinal symptoms; (4) vitamin D supplementation, rather than calcium supplementation, may reduce falls risk; and (5) assertions of increased cardiovascular risk consequent to calcium supplementation are not convincingly supported by current evidence. In conclusion, we recommend, on the basis of the current evidence, that calcium supplementation, with concomitant vitamin D supplementation, is supported for patients at high risk of calcium and vitamin D insufficiency, and in those who are receiving treatment for osteoporosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available