4.4 Article

Feasibility of Preoperative Chemotherapy with Docetaxel, Cisplatin, and 5-Fluorouracil versus Adriamycin, Cisplatin, and 5-Fluorouracil for Resectable Advanced Esophageal Cancer

Journal

ONCOLOGY
Volume 92, Issue 2, Pages 101-108

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000452765

Keywords

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; Chemoradiotherapy; Adverse events

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for resectable advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) requires reassessment. We have conducted a trial aiming at the comparison between DCF and ACF concerning perioperative adverse events. Methods: Patients were randomly assigned to receive either DCF [docetaxel 70 mg/m(2), cisplatin 70 mg/m(2) on day 1, and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 700 mg/m(2) for 5 days] every 3 weeks or ACF (adriamycin 35 mg/m(2), cisplatin 70 mg/m(2) on day 1, and 5-FU 700 mg/m(2) for 7 days) every 4 weeks. Each group consisted of 81 patients. Two cycles of preoperative chemotherapy were planned, after which patients underwent subtotal esophagectomy via a right thoracotomy with lymphadenectomy. Chemotherapy- and surgery-related adverse effects were assessed. Results: Grade 3-4 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia occurred in 90 and 39% of patients, respectively, in the DCF group compared with 69 and 17% of patients, respectively, in the ACF group (p<0.01). Perioperative complications did not differ significantly between the groups. The overall response rates of DCF and ACF were 61 and 40%, respectively, while the histopathological complete responses were 15 and 3%, respectively (p<0.01). Conclusion: The DCF and ACF regimens were found to be equally feasible in patients with resectable advanced ESCC; however, DCF delivered an antitumor effect and therefore potentially improved the long-term outcomes. (C) 2016 S. Karger AG, Basel

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available