4.5 Article

Personal exposure to ultrafine particles from PVC welding and concrete work during tunnel rehabilitation

Journal

OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE
Volume 73, Issue 7, Pages 467-473

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2015-103411

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Norwegian Public Roads Administration

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives To investigate the exposure to number concentration of ultrafine particles and the size distribution in the breathing zone of workers during rehabilitation of a subsea tunnel. Methods Personal exposure was measured using a TSI 3091 Fast Mobility Particle Sizer (FMPS), measuring the number concentration of submicrometre particles (including ultrafine particles) and the particle size distribution in the size range 5.6-560 nm. The measurements were performed in the breathing zone of the operators by the use of a conductive silicone tubing. Working tasks studied were operation of the slipforming machine, operations related to finishing the verge, and welding the PVC membrane. In addition, background levels were measured. Results Arithmetic mean values of ultrafine particles were in the range 6.26x10(5)-3.34x10(6). Vertical PVC welding gave the highest exposure. Horizontal welding was the work task with the highest maximum peak exposure, 8.1x10(7) particles/cm(3). Background concentrations of 4.0x10(4)-3.1x10(5) were found in the tunnel. The mobility diameter at peak particle concentration varied between 10.8 nm during horizontal PVC welding and during breaks and 60.4 nm while finishing the verge. Conclusions PVC welding in a vertical position resulted in very high exposure of the worker to ultrafine particles compared to other types of work tasks. In evaluations of worker exposure to ultrafine particles, it seems important to distinguish between personal samples taken in the breathing zone of the worker and more stationary work area measurements. There is a need for a portable particle-sizing instrument for measurements of ultrafine particles in working environments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available