4.4 Article

Nutrient intake and cerebral metabolism in healthy middle-aged adults: Implications for cognitive aging

Journal

NUTRITIONAL NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 20, Issue 8, Pages 489-496

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/1028415X.2016.1186341

Keywords

Diet; Polyunsaturated fat; Saturated fat; Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy; Executive function; Memory; Aging

Funding

  1. American Federation for Aging Research [8A0024]
  2. National Institutes of Health [R01 NS075565]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: Growing evidence suggests dietary factors influence cognition, but the effects of nutrient intake on cerebral metabolism in adults are currently unknown. The present study investigated the relationship between major macronutrient intake (fat, carbohydrate, and protein) and cerebral neurochemical profiles in middle-aged adults. Methods: Thirty-six adults recorded dietary intake for 3 days prior to completing cognitive testing and a proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (H-1-MRS) scan. H-1-MRS of occipitoparietal gray matter was used to assess glutamate (Glu), N-acetyl-aspartate (NAA), choline (Cho), and myo-inositol (mI) relative to creatine (Cr) levels. Results: Regression analyses revealed that high intake of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) was associated with lower cerebral Glu/Cr (P=0.005), and high intake of saturated fat (SFA) was associated with poorer memory function (P=0.030) independent of age, sex, education, estimated intelligence, total caloric intake, and body mass index. Discussion: In midlife, greater PUFA intake (-3 and -6) may be associated with lower cerebral glutamate, potentially indicating more efficient cellular reuptake of glutamate. SFA intake, on the other hand, was linked with poorer memory performance. These results suggest that dietary fat intake modification may be an important intervention target for the prevention of cognitive decline.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available