4.4 Article

A longitudinal study of neuromelanin-sensitive magnetic resonance imaging in Parkinson's disease

Journal

NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS
Volume 633, Issue -, Pages 112-117

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2016.09.011

Keywords

Neuromelanin-sensitive magnetic resonance imaging; 3T magnetic resonance imaging; Parkinson's disease; Longitudinal study

Categories

Funding

  1. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25870325] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Neuromelanin-sensitive MR imaging (NMI) is an increasingly powerful tool for the diagnosis of Parkinson's disease (PD). This study was undertaken to evaluate longitudinal changes on NMI in PD patients. Methods: We examined longitudinal changes on NMI in 14 PD patients. The area and contrast ratio (CR) of the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNc) were comparatively analyzed. Results: The total area and CR of the SNc upon follow-up NMI were significantly smaller than those on initial NMI (from 33.5 +/- 18.9 pixels and 6.35 +/- 2.86% to 21.5 +/- 16.7 pixels and 4.19 +/- 2.11%; Wilcoxon signed-rank test, p < 0.001 and p = 0.022, respectively). The area and CR of the dominant side SNc upon initial NMI were significantly greater than those on follow-up NMI (from 15.3 +/- 9.1 pixels and 6.5 +/- 2.7% to 7.9 +/- 8.5 pixels and 3.7 +/- 2.9%; Wilcoxon signed-rank test, p = 0.002 and p = 0.007, respectively). On a case-by-case basis, the area of the SNc invariably decreased upon follow-up NMI in all patients. We further demonstrated that the total area and CR of the SNc negatively correlated with disease duration (Pearson correlation coefficient, r=-0.63, p < 0.001 and r = 0.41, p = 0.031, respectively). In area analyses, our results demonstrated very high intraclass correlation coefficients for both intra- and inter-rater reliability. Conclusion: NMI is a useful and reliable tool for detecting neuropathological changes over time in PD patients. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available