4.5 Article

LITHIUM ACCELERATES FUNCTIONAL MOTOR RECOVERY BY IMPROVING REMYELINATION OF REGENERATING AXONS FOLLOWING VENTRAL ROOT AVULSION AND REIMPLANTATION

Journal

NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 329, Issue -, Pages 213-225

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.05.010

Keywords

lithium; ventral root; avulsion; reimplantation; motor function; remyelination

Categories

Funding

  1. Health & Education Joint Research Grant of Fujian, P.R.C [WKJ-FJ-08]
  2. HKSCI Fund
  3. National Basic Research Program of China (973 program) [2014CB542205]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Brachial plexus injury (BPI) often involves the complete or partial avulsion of one or more of the cervical nerve roots, which leads to permanent paralysis of the innervated muscles. Reimplantation surgery has been attempted as a clinical treatment for brachial plexus root avulsion but has failed to achieve complete functional recovery. Lithium is a mood stabilizer drug that is used to treat bipolar disorder; however, its effects on spinal cord or peripheral nerve injuries have also been reported. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether lithium can improve functional motor recovery after ventral root avulsion and reimplantation in a rat model of BPI. The results showed that systemic treatment with a clinical dose of lithium promoted motor neuron outgrowth and increased the efficiency of motor unit regeneration through enhanced remyelination. An analysis of myelin-associated genes showed that the effects of lithium started during the early phase of remyelination and persisted through the late stage of the process. Efficient remyelination of the regenerated axons in the lithium-treated rats led to an earlier functional recovery. Therefore, we demonstrated that lithium might be a potential clinical treatment for BPI in combination with reimplantation surgery. (C) 2016 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available