4.3 Article

The representational-hierarchical view of pattern separation: Not just hippocampus, not just space, not just memory?

Journal

NEUROBIOLOGY OF LEARNING AND MEMORY
Volume 129, Issue -, Pages 99-106

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.nlm.2016.01.006

Keywords

Pattern separation; Memory; Hippocampus; Perirhinal cortex; Representational-hierarchical; Perception

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council/Wellcome Trust [089703/Z/09/Z]
  2. Gates Cambridge
  3. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  4. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/G019002/1, BBS/B/0904X] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. Medical Research Council [G0001354B, G1000183B] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. BBSRC [BB/G019002/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pattern separation (PS) has been defined as a process of reducing overlap between similar input patterns to minimize interference amongst stored representations. The present article describes this putative PS process from the representational-hierarchical perspective (R-H), which uses a hierarchical continuum instead of a cognitive modular processing framework to describe the organization of the ventral visual perirhinal-hippocampal processing stream. Instead of trying to map psychological constructs onto anatomical modules in the brain, the R-H model suggests that the function of brain regions depends upon what representations they contain. We begin by discussing a main principle of the R-H framework, the resolution of ambiguity of lower level representations via the formation of unique conjunctive representations in higher level areas, and how this process is remarkably similar to definitions of PS. Work from several species and experimental approaches suggest that this principle of resolution of ambiguity via conjunctive representations has considerable explanatory power, leads to wide possibilities for experimentation, and also supports some perhaps surprising conclusions. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available