4.3 Article

Efficacy of different respiratory supports to prevent hypoxia during flexible bronchoscopy in patients of COPD: a triple-arm, randomised controlled trial

Journal

BMJ OPEN RESPIRATORY RESEARCH
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmjresp-2022-001524

Keywords

Bronchoscopy; COPD Exacerbations; Non invasive ventilation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared the efficacy of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) and high-flow oxygen therapy (HFOT) with conventional oxygen therapy (COT) in COPD patients undergoing bronchoscopy, and found that NIV and HFOT were superior in preventing hypoxia.
Background Patients with chronic-obstructive-pulmonary-disease (COPD) undergo bronchoscopy for various reasons, and are at relatively higher risk of complications. This study evaluated the efficacy of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) and high-flow-oxygen-therapy (HFOT) compared with conventional-oxygen-therapy (COT) in patients with COPD undergoing bronchoscopy, to prevent hypoxia.Methods It was a triple-arm, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Ninety patients with COPD were randomly assigned into three intervention arms in 1:1:1 ratio. The incidence of hypoxia, lowest recorded oxygen saturation measured by plethysmography (SpO(2)), ECG, patient vitals and comfort levels were assessed.Results Mean age of the study population was 61.71 +/- 7.5 years. Out of 90 cases enrolled, 51, 34 and 5 were moderate, severe and very-severe COPD, respectively, as per GOLD (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease) classification. Rest of the baseline characteristics were similar. SpO(2) during flexible bronchoscopy (FB) was lowest in COT group (COT: 87.03 +/- 5.7% vs HFOT: 95.57 +/- 5.0% vs NIV: 97.40 +/- 1.6%, p<0.001). Secondary objectives were similar except respiratory-rate (breaths-per-minute) which was highest in COT group (COT: 20.23 +/- 3.1 vs HFOT: 18.57 +/- 4.1 vs NIV: 16.80 +/- 1.9, p<0.001). Whereas post FB partial of oxygen in arterial blood was highest in NIV group (NIV: 84.27 +/- 21.6 mm Hg vs HFOT: 69.03 +/- 13.6 mm Hg vs COT: 69.30 +/- 11.9 mm Hg, p<0.001). Post FB partial pressure of carbon dioxide in arterial blood was similar in the three arms. Operator's ease-of-performing-procedure was least in the NIV group as assessed with Visual Analogue Scale (p<0.01). A higher number of NIV group participants reported nasal pain as compared with the other two arms (p<0.01).Conclusion NIV and HFOT are superior to COT in preventing hypoxia during bronchoscopy, but NIV is associated with poor patient-tolerance and inferior operator's ease of doing procedure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

Article Clinical Neurology

Dynamic assessment of oropharynx with ultrasonography as a screening tool for obstructive sleep apnea

Manjunath B. Govindagoudar, Lokesh Kumar Lalwani, Pawan Kumar Singh, Jyotsna Sen, Dhruva Chaudhry

Summary: This study evaluated the utility of ultrasonography as a screening tool for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The results showed that ultrasonography provides a near complete picture of the dynamic changes and collapsibility of the oropharynx, and has good diagnostic ability in predicting OSA.

JOURNAL OF SLEEP RESEARCH (2023)

Letter Medicine, General & Internal

Comprehensive diagnostic evaluation of palpatory method of blood pressure measurement

Yogita Kumar, Pawan Kumar Singh, Dhruva Chaudhry, Amit Sharma, Pooja Yadav

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE (2023)

No Data Available