4.2 Article

The production of rightlessness: palm oil companies and land dispossession in Indonesia

Journal

GLOBALIZATIONS
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14747731.2023.2253657

Keywords

Rightlessness; dispossession; land conflict; palm oil; law; Indonesia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article explains why palm oil companies are able to easily dispossess rural Indonesians of their land by comparing the global land grabbing. By analyzing 150 conflicts between rural communities and palm oil companies, the article examines the processes through which companies acquire land and the legal provisions that facilitate these processes. The authors argue that palm oil companies succeed in dispossessing rural Indonesians because of the combination of formal regulations and informal practices that result in rightlessness for the affected communities.
Addressing the comparative study of global land grabbing, this article seeks to explain the relative ease with which palm oil companies dispossess rural Indonesians of their land. Employing detailed documentation of 150 conflicts between rural communities and palm oil companies, we analyse both the actual processes through which companies acquire land as well as the legal provisions that facilitate these processes. We argue that palm oil companies are succeeding in dispossessing rural Indonesians because of the ways in which formal regulations and informal machinations have produced rightlessness. This rightlessness has three main sources: curtailed land rights, 'backdoored' legal protections, and collusive business-politics relationships which enable companies to evade regulations. We draw attention to the varying role of the state in processes of dispossession: compared to 'regimes of dispossession' elsewhere, companies rather than the state organize the actual land dispossession. This smaller role of the state disadvantages affected communities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available