4.3 Article

Gender and Generation: Landownership and Older Indians' Autonomy

Journal

FEMINIST ECONOMICS
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/13545701.2023.2255878

Keywords

Landownership; gender inequality; older Indians; decision-making power; mortality; J16; J14; Q15

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article examines the gender asymmetry in the association between older individuals' decision-making power at home and their ownership and control over agricultural land in rural India. The results reveal that for older men, landownership at the household level is positively related to decision-making power and survival probability. However, this relationship does not exist for older women. Among older women, the relationship between household landownership and decision-making power is positive only when they have clear titles to the land, otherwise it is negative.
While increased access to household assets has been shown to improve older individuals' autonomy and bargaining power at home, the role of gender hierarchy in shaping differential impacts of household assets has received far less attention. This article explores the gender asymmetry in the association of older people's (age 60 years or more) decision-making power at home and survival probability with their ownership of and managerial control over agricultural land in rural India. Using data from the India Human Development Survey, results find that in multi-generational households, landownership at the household level is associated with higher decision-making power and survival probability for older men but not for older women. Among older women, the relationship between household landownership and decision-making power is positive when they have clearly established titles to the land or managerial control but negative when their names are not on the land title.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available