4.1 Article

Emergence of autocatalytic sets in a simple model of technological evolution

Journal

JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY ECONOMICS
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00191-023-00838-2

Keywords

TAP; RAF; Adjacent possible; Combinatorial innovation; C63; O31

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study combines the views of technological evolution as combinatorial innovation and a network of product transformations as an autocatalytic set. The compatibility between the two models is demonstrated, and it is shown that product transformation networks resulting from combinatorial models have a high probability of containing autocatalytic sets. The findings further support the notion that the economy can be seen as an autocatalytic set, reconciling conflicting views of evolution and mutualism in economics.
Two alternative views of an economy are combined and studied. The first view is that of technological evolution as a process of combinatorial innovation. Recently a simple mathematical model (TAP) was introduced to study such a combinatorial process. The second view is that of a network of product transformations forming an autocatalytic set. Autocatalytic (RAF) sets have been studied extensively in the context of chemical reaction networks. Here, we combine the two models (TAP and RAF) and show that they are compatible. In particular, it is shown that product transformation networks resulting from the combinatorial TAP model have a high probability of containing autocatalytic (RAF) sets. We also study the size distribution and robustness of such economic autocatalytic sets, and compare our results with those from the chemical context. These initial results strongly support earlier claims that the economy can indeed be seen as an autocatalytic set, and reconcile seemingly opposing views of evolution vs. mutualism in economics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available