4.6 Article

Comparison of individual, ensemble and integrated ensemble machine learning methods to predict China's SME credit risk in supply chain finance

Journal

NEURAL COMPUTING & APPLICATIONS
Volume 28, Issue -, Pages S41-S50

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00521-016-2304-x

Keywords

Supply chain finance; Credit risk; Small- and medium-sized enterprises; Core enterprises; Individual machine learning; Ensemble machine learning; Integrated ensemble machine learning

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71373072, 71501066]
  2. China Scholarship Council [201506135022]
  3. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education [20130161110031]
  4. Foundation for Innovative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [71221001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Supply chain finance (SCF) becomes more important for small-and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) due to global credit crunch, supply chain financing woes and tightening credit criteria for corporate lending. Currently, predicting SME credit risk is significant for guaranteeing SCF in smooth operation. In this paper, we apply six methods, i.e., one individual machine learning (IML, i.e., decision tree) method, three ensemble machine learning methods [EML, i.e., bagging, boosting, and random subspace (RS)], and two integrated ensemble machine learning methods (IEML, i.e., RS-boosting and multiboosting), to predict SMEs credit risk in SCF and compare the effectiveness and feasibility of six methods. In the experiment, we choose the quarterly financial and non-financial data of 48 listed SMEs from Small and Medium Enterprise Board of Shenzhen Stock Exchange, six listed core enterprises (CEs) from Shanghai Stock Exchange and three listed CEs from Shenzhen Stock Exchange during the period of 2012-2013 as the empirical samples. Experimental results reveal that the IEML methods acquire better performance than IML and EML method. In particular, RS-boosting is the best method to predict SMEs credit risk among six methods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available