4.5 Review

Optogenetic stimulation of the cochlea-A review of mechanisms, measurements, and first models

Journal

NETWORK-COMPUTATION IN NEURAL SYSTEMS
Volume 27, Issue 2-3, Pages 212-236

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/0954898X.2016.1224944

Keywords

Auditory system; cochlear implants; optogenetics; spiking neurons

Funding

  1. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research within the Munich Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience [01GQ1004B]
  2. DFG Ultrafast and temporally precise information processing: normal and dysfunctional hearing [SPP 1608, HE6713/1-1, HE6713/1-2]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review evaluates the potential of optogenetic methods for the stimulation of the auditory nerve and assesses the feasability of optogenetic cochlear implants (CIs). It provides an overview of all critical steps like opsin targeting strategies, how opsins work, how their function can be modeled and included in neuronal models and the properties of light sources available for optical stimulation. From these foundations, quantitative estimates for the number of independent stimulation channels and the temporal precision of optogenetic stimulation of the auditory nerve are derived and compared with state-of-the-art electrical CIs. We conclude that optogenetic CIs have the potential to increase the number of independent stimulation channels by up to one order of magnitude to about 100, but only if light sources are able to deliver confined illumination patterns independently and parallelly. Already now, opsin variants like ChETA and Chronos enable driving of the auditory nerve up to rates of 200 spikes/s, close to the physiological value of their maximum sustained firing rate. Apart from requiring 10 times more energy than electrical stimulation, optical CIs still face major hurdles concerning the safety of gene transfection and optrode array implantation, for example, before becoming an option to replace electrical CIs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available