4.1 Article

'Digital Tournaments': the colonisation of freelancers' 'free' time and unpaid labour in the online platform economy

Journal

CAMBRIDGE JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/cje/bead042

Keywords

Working time; Free time; Freelancers; Digital platforms; Unpaid labour; Platform work

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article challenges the positive views on the relationships between skills, productivity, and rewards for self-employed digital freelancers. It argues that the investments made by freelancers to build up positive platform ratings do not necessarily result in increased autonomy or economic benefits. The article also highlights the competition and unpaid labor that freelancers face in the digital marketplace, as well as the inability to transfer their investments to other platforms.
This article challenges positive views of the assumed relationships between skills, productivity and rewards in self-employed digital freelancing. It suggests that the upfront investments made by freelancers to build up positive platform ratings are not necessarily recouped in the form of increased autonomy, guaranteed work or more lucrative 'gigs'. Drawing on 38 autobiographical narrative interviews and 12 audio working diaries with diverse online freelancers in Europe, we show how the low barriers to enter platform work provide opportunities for those with limited work experience and other commitments outside of work. However, the intense competition between an ever-expanding pool of (both skilled and unskilled) task freelancers within 'digital tournaments' results in the colonisation of worker's free time, and the normalisation of unpaid labour. This implies that 'free time' for freelancers is largely an illusion. Furthermore, the significant 'sunk costs' that freelancers make in terms of time, platform-specific skills, reputation and networks are not fully recovered and cannot be transferred to other platforms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available