Realizing operational and innovation benefits in buyer-supplier relationships: the role of close ties to the partner & apos;s partners

PurposeAs buyers and suppliers seek to create value, they face the challenge of creating an environment that promotes coordination and information sharing and discourages opportunism. While the literature suggested dyadic mechanisms to create such an environment, this study focuses on ties beyond the buyer-supplier dyad. Specifically, close connections to one's partner's partners (CPP) are crucial in the realization of benefits for buyers and suppliers.Design/methodology/approachDrawing from embeddedness theory and governance theory, the authors developed a contingency framework to examine when CPP are beneficial or counterproductive considering two dyadic attributes - relational capital (RC) and partner dependence. Analyses were conducted using data from a dyadic survey complemented with archival data on 106 buyer-supplier relationships (BSRs).FindingsThe study reveals that CPP both help and hurt in the realization of benefits. Stark asymmetries exist between the impact of CPP on the buyer and supplier sides. For buyers, CPP exert a direct positive effect on operational and innovation benefits. For suppliers, the effect of CPP on operational and innovation benefits is contingent on buyer dependence and RC - CPP serves as a substitute for buyer dependence and RC. There are no such contingency effects for buyers. Further analysis identifies situations for suppliers when CPP hurt the realization of benefits.Originality/valueThe study highlights the importance of CPP to foster efficiency and innovation within BSRs and illustrates how their impact varies across contingency conditions and across the parties within a dyad.

Automated summary

This study explores the impact of close connections to one's partner's partners (CPP) on the realization of benefits in buyer-supplier relationships. It finds that CPP have both positive and negative effects on operational and innovation benefits for buyers and suppliers, with asymmetries between the two parties. The study also identifies contingency conditions where CPP can hinder the realization of benefits for suppliers.