4.3 Review

Effect of birth weight on adulthood renal function: A bias-adjusted meta-analytic approach

Journal

NEPHROLOGY
Volume 21, Issue 7, Pages 547-565

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nep.12732

Keywords

birth weight; meta-analysis; renal function; systematic review

Ask authors/readers for more resources

While the association between low birth weight (LBW; <2500g) and development of adult chronic renal disease (CKD) is inconsistently reported, less information is available regarding association of high birth weight (HBW; 4000g) with CKD. We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis on studies published before 30 September 2015 and report associations between birth weight and renal function. Blood (glomerular filtration rate (GFR)) and urine (microalbuminuria/albumin excreation rate (AER)/urinary albumin creatinine ratio (ACR)) parameters were used to define CKD. Three different effect size estimates were used (odds ratio, regression coefficient and mean difference). The odds of developing CKD in the life course among those born LBW was 1.77 (95% CI: 1.42, 2.20) times and 1.68 (1.27, 2.33) times, assessed by blood and urine parameters respectively. Higher risk was also observed among Asian and Australian populations (blood: OR 2.68; urine: OR 2.28), individuals aged 30years (blood: OR 2.30; urine: OR 1.26), and 50years (blood: OR 3.66; urine: OR 3.10), people with diabetes (blood: OR 2.51), and aborigines (urine: OR 2.32). There was no significant association between HBW and CKD. For every 1kg increase in BW, the estimated GFR increased by 2.09mL/min per 1.73m(2) (1.33-2.85), and it was negatively associated with LogACR (ss -0.07, 95% CI: -0.14, 0.00). LBW inborn had lower mean GFR -4.62 (-7.10, -2.14) compared with normal BW. Findings of this study suggest that LBW increased the risk of developing CKD, and HBW did not show any significant impact. Summary at a Glance Findings of this study suggest that Low Body Weight increased the risk of developing CKD and High Body Weight did not show any significant impact. This is an interesting meta-analysis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available