Metacognition of curiosity: People underestimate the seductive lure of non-instrumental information
Published 2023 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Metacognition of curiosity: People underestimate the seductive lure of non-instrumental information
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Online
2023-11-07
DOI
10.3758/s13423-023-02404-0
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- A reward-learning framework of knowledge acquisition: An integrated account of curiosity, interest, and intrinsic–extrinsic rewards.
- (2022) Kou Murayama PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW
- Thinking about thinking: People underestimate how enjoyable and engaging just waiting is.
- (2022) Aya Hatano et al. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL
- Counterfactual curiosity: motivated thinking about what might have been
- (2022) Lily Fitzgibbon et al. PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES
- People underestimate their capability to motivate themselves without performance-based extrinsic incentives
- (2022) Kei Kuratomi et al. MOTIVATION AND EMOTION
- SAS for Mixed Models: Introduction and Basic Applications
- (2021) Christine R. Wells AMERICAN STATISTICIAN
- Shared striatal activity in decisions to satisfy curiosity and hunger at the risk of electric shocks
- (2020) Johnny King L. Lau et al. Nature Human Behaviour
- The seductive lure of curiosity: information as a motivationally salient reward
- (2020) Lily FitzGibbon et al. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
- Costly curiosity: People pay a price to resolve an uncertain gamble early
- (2019) J.A. Max Rodriguez Cabrero et al. BEHAVIOURAL PROCESSES
- How Curiosity Enhances Hippocampus-Dependent Memory: The Prediction, Appraisal, Curiosity, and Exploration (PACE) Framework
- (2019) Matthias J. Gruber et al. TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES
- Valuation of knowledge and ignorance in mesolimbic reward circuitry
- (2018) Caroline J. Charpentier et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Towards a neuroscience of active sampling and curiosity
- (2018) Jacqueline Gottlieb et al. NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE
- Active Inference, Curiosity and Insight
- (2017) Karl J. Friston et al. NEURAL COMPUTATION
- Orexin activation counteracts decreases in nonexercise activity thermogenesis (NEAT) caused by high-fat diet
- (2017) P.E. Bunney et al. PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR
- Intrinsic Valuation of Information in Decision Making under Uncertainty
- (2016) Daniel Bennett et al. PLoS Computational Biology
- The Psychology and Neuroscience of Curiosity
- (2015) Celeste Kidd et al. NEURON
- States of Curiosity Modulate Hippocampus-Dependent Learning via the Dopaminergic Circuit
- (2014) Matthias J. Gruber et al. NEURON
- Self-Regulated Learning: Beliefs, Techniques, and Illusions
- (2012) Robert A. Bjork et al. Annual Review of Psychology
- From prediction error to incentive salience: mesolimbic computation of reward motivation
- (2012) Kent C. Berridge EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
- Nucleus accumbens response to food cues predicts subsequent snack consumption in women and increased body mass index in those with reduced self-control
- (2012) Natalia S. Lawrence et al. NEUROIMAGE
- Lateral habenula neurons signal errors in the prediction of reward information
- (2011) Ethan S Bromberg-Martin et al. NATURE NEUROSCIENCE
- Fictive Reward Signals in the Anterior Cingulate Cortex
- (2009) B. Y. Hayden et al. SCIENCE
- The incentive sensitization theory of addiction: some current issues
- (2008) T. E Robinson et al. PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES
Add your recorded webinar
Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.
Upload NowBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started