4.7 Article

Analysis of mechanical performance of modular steel-concrete composite joints considering floor slab composite effects

Publisher

ELSEVIER - DIVISION REED ELSEVIER INDIA PVT LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jestch.2023.101554

Keywords

Prefabricated; Steel -concrete composite joints; Floor slab combination effect; Mechanical performance

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study establishes and verifies finite element models of modular steel-concrete composite joints, and evaluates the effects of column axial compression ratio, floor width, floor thickness, and floor reinforcement ratio on the mechanical performance of the joints. The results indicate that these factors have varying influences on the joints' behavior.
This study establishes and verifies the finite element models (FEM) of MSCCJs to analyze the mechanical per-formance of modular steel-concrete composite joints (MSCCJs) under monotonic static load without considering the floor slab composite effect (FSCE). Subsequently, 12 MSCCJ models incorporating the FSCE are constructed using ABAQUS. The study evaluates the effects of varying column axial compression ratios (n = 0.15, 0.25, 0.4, 0.6), floor width (w = 800, 1200 mm), floor thickness (t = 90, 110, 120 mm), and floor reinforcement ratio (r = 6 %, 8 %, 12 %) on the bending moment, initial stiffness (k0), ductility, and stress transfer of the joints. The results indicated that as n increases, the shear stress concentration in the joint core module (JCM) and the steel framework at the lower column end become more pronounced. Concurrently, the bearing moment and k0 of the joint also increase. However, once n surpasses 0.4, the joint's plastic properties diminish upon damage. With an increment in w, the k0 and ductility deformation of the joint remain stable and then decline. At w = 1000 mm, the joint's bearing capacity, stress distribution, and deformation performance reach their optimum. Since it signif-icantly impacts stress distribution, its effect on the joint's mechanical performance is minimal. Lastly, the value of r enhances the ductility of MSCCJs and the stress concentration in the reinforcement. It is advisable to maintain r between 1.1 % and 1.7 %.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available