4.7 Article

CO2 Adsorption Behavior of Nanosized CHA Zeolites Synthesized in the Presence of Barium or Calcium Cations

Journal

ADVANCED SUSTAINABLE SYSTEMS
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adsu.202300326

Keywords

alkaline-earth metal cations; chabazite; CO2 adsorption; gas separation; nanozeolites

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Alkaline-earth metal cations affect the crystallization rate and adsorption properties of nanosized chabazite zeolites. The presence of calcium or barium leads to changes in crystallization rate and adsorption capacity, while maintaining similar crystallite size and morphology.
Alkaline-earth metal cations impact the rate of crystallization and the adsorption of N-2 and CO2 on nanosized chabazite zeolites. In this study, either calcium or barium is added to precursor mixtures containing alkali-metal cations (Na+, K+, Cs+) to prepare chabazite (labeled Ca-CHA and Ba-CHA), and are compared to a reference sample (Ref-CHA) synthesized using exclusively Na+, K+, and Cs+. Partial substitution of the Na+ and the pore-blocking Cs+ extra-framework cations is observed for Ca-CHA depending on the molar ratio of K2O used in the synthesis, while a change to the amount of Na+ cations only is observed for Ba-CHA. The type of alkaline-earth metal cation affects the crystallization rate; slower in the presence of Ca2+ (10 h to full crystallinity) and similar rates in the presence of Ba2+ (4 h to full crystallinity); the crystallite size and morphology remained similar. The presence of Ca2+ or Ba2+ extra-framework cations leads to N-2 uptake values of 290 and 169 mmol g(-1) (-196 degrees C, 100 kPa), respectively, while at low CO2 pressure (<1 kPa, 25 degrees C), the physisorbed CO2 capacity for Ref-CHA, Ca-CHA, and Ba-CHA zeolites is 0.63, 0.66, and 0.59 mmol g(-1), respectively. Interestingly, an opposite effect is observed for the amount of chemisorbed CO2 species.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available