4.2 Review

Imaging the cerebellum in post-traumatic stress and anxiety disorders: a mini-review

Journal

FRONTIERS IN SYSTEMS NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 17, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fnsys.2023.1197350

Keywords

cerebellum; vermis; anxiety; stress; PTSD; human neuroimaging; MRI

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a mini-review of studies using magnetic resonance imaging to investigate the involvement of the cerebellum in post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and anxiety disorders. The results show mixed findings, but suggest that structures within the cerebellum, such as the vermis, are highly involved in these disorders. However, further research is needed to fully understand the neurofunctional and structural alterations in the cerebellum related to excessive anxiety and trauma.
Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and anxiety disorders are among the most prevalent psychiatric conditions worldwide sharing many clinical manifestations and, most likely, neural mechanisms as suggested by neuroimaging research. While the so-called fear circuitry and traditional limbic structures of the brain, particularly the amygdala, have been extensively studied in sufferers of these disorders, the cerebellum has been relatively underexplored. The aim of this paper was to present a mini-review of functional (task-activity or resting-state connectivity) and structural (gray matter volume) results on the cerebellum as reported in magnetic resonance imaging studies of patients with PTSD or anxiety disorders (49 selected studies in 1,494 patients). While mixed results were noted overall, e.g., regarding the direction of effects and anatomical localization, cerebellar structures like the vermis seem to be highly involved. Still, the neurofunctional and structural alterations reported for the cerebellum in excessive anxiety and trauma are complex, and in need of further evaluation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available