4.2 Review

Take it to the limit

Journal

EVOLUTION MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages 415-428

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/emph/eoad035

Keywords

obstetrical dilemma; pregnancy; energetics; birth; EGG hypothesis; secondary altriciality

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article examines the reasons for the relative immaturity of human newborns. One viewpoint suggests that this is due to pelvic remodeling caused by bipedal locomotion, while another argues for maternal energetic limitations during pregnancy. Through a meta-analysis of published studies, it was found that the metabolic challenge during pregnancy is lower than previously believed, and there is no correlation between metabolic variations and birth timing. Therefore, metabolic constraints are not the main factor determining gestation length.
A hallmark of modern humans is that our newborns are neurologically immature compared to other primates. It is disputed whether this so-called secondary altriciality evolved due to remodelling of the pelvis associated with bipedal locomotion, as suggested by the obstetrical dilemma hypothesis, or from maternal energetic limitations during pregnancy. Specifically, the 'Energetics of Gestation and Growth' (EGG) hypothesis posits that birth is initiated when foetal energy requirements exceed the maximum sustained maternal metabolic rate during pregnancy at around 2.1 x basal metabolic rate (BMR) of the non-pregnant, non-lactating condition (NPNL). However, the metabolic threshold argued under the EGG framework is derived from one study with a small sample size of only 12 women from the UK. Accordingly, we performed a meta-analysis of all published studies on metabolic scopes during pregnancy to better account for variability. After excluding 3 studies with methodological issues, a total of 12 studies with 303 women from 5 high- and 3 low-income countries were analysed. On average, pregnancy was found to be less metabolically challenging than previously suggested. The studies revealed substantial variation in metabolic scope during pregnancy, which was not reflected by variation in birth timing. Further, in a third of the studies, the metabolic rates exceeded 2.1 x BMRNPNL. Our simulation of foetal energy requirements demonstrated that this metabolic threshold of 2.1 x BMRNPNL cannot realistically be crossed by the foetus around the time of birth. These findings imply that metabolic constraints are not the main limiting factor dictating gestation length. It remains controversial whether human newborns are relatively immature because of evolutionary pressures for a narrow pelvis or maternal energetic limitations. This meta-analysis found no evidence that women approach an energetic threshold of 2.0-2.1 x BMR towards the end of pregnancy, thus challenging metabolic explanations for birth timing and secondary altriciality.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available