4.7 Article

Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes: Is Age at Onset a Determining Factor in Advanced Hybrid Closed-Loop Insulin Therapy?

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
Volume 12, Issue 21, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm12216951

Keywords

advanced hybrid closed-loop; age at onset; MiniMed (TM) 780G; pediatric type 1 diabetes; time in hyperglycemia; time in range

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study analyzed the application of continuous glucose monitoring systems with insulin infusion pumps in pediatric patients and found that the system implantation can improve glycemic control, especially in patients with an onset age of more than 4 years. However, there are still challenges in management for pediatric patients, especially in terms of hyperglycemia and glycemic variability.
Background: The integration of continuous glucose monitoring systems with insulin infusion pumps has shown improved glycemic control, with improvements in hyperglycemia, hypoglycemia, Hb1Ac, and greater autonomy in daily life. These have been most studied in adults and there are currently not many articles published in the pediatric population that establish their correlation with age of debut. Methods: Prospective, single-study. A total of 28 patients (mean age 12 +/- 2.43 years, 57% male, duration of diabetes 7.84 +/- 2.46 years) were included and divided into two groups according to age at T1D onset (<= 4 years and >4 years). Follow-up for 3 months, with glucometric variables extracted at different cut-off points after the start of the closed-loop (baseline, 1 month, 3 months). Results: Significant improvement was evidenced at 1 month and 3 months after closed-loop system implantation, with better glycemic control in the older age group at baseline at TIR (74.06% +/- 6.37% vs. 80.33% +/- 7.49% at 1 month, p < 0.003; 71.87% +/- 6.58% vs. 78.75% +/- 5.94% at 3 months, p < 0.009), TAR1 (18.25% +/- 4.54% vs. 14.33% +/- 5.74% at 1 month, p < 0.006; 19.87% +/- 5.15% vs. 14.67% +/- 4. 36% at 3 months, p < 0.009) and TAR2 (4.75% +/- 2.67% vs. 2.75% +/- 1.96% at 1 month, p = 0.0307; 5.40% +/- 2.85% vs. 3% +/- 2.45% at 3 months, p < 0.027). Conclusions: the use of automated systems such as the MiniMed (TM) 780G system brings glucometric results closer to those recommended by consensus, especially in age at T1D onset >4 years. However, the management in pediatrics continues to be a challenge even after the implementation of these systems, especially in terms of hyperglycemia and glycemic variability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available