4.7 Article

U-Pb zircon geochronology by LAICPMS combined with thermal annealing: Achievements in precision and accuracy on dating standard and unknown samples

Journal

CHEMICAL GEOLOGY
Volume 414, Issue -, Pages 109-123

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2015.09.008

Keywords

LAICPMS; Thermal annealing; Zircon; U-Pb geochronology; Isotopic composition

Funding

  1. UNAM project Papiit-Dgapa [IN102414]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

U-Pb zircon dating by LAICPMS is one of the most popular geochronological techniques, however it still suffers from some accuracy and precision problems. These are mostly due to the slight differences in behavior between zircons, and differential coupling with the laser radiation, probably the result from crystal damage induced by the radioactive decay of U and Th. These result in difficult-to-predict and even irreproducible matrix effects, impinging on the precision and accuracy of the technique. Here, we explore the effect that thermal annealing has on the analysis of zircons by LAICPMS, to improve U-Pb age results obtained We document the advantages of thermal annealing by means of two experiments on standard and several igneous zircons, spanning different degrees of crystallization history complexity. In general, pretreatment of zircons by thermal annealing yieldsmore accurate ages (e.g., 336.87 +/- 0.49 Ma for the annealed Plesovice standard zircon, vs 340.24 +/- 0.49 Ma when not annealed) with significantly less dispersion (e.g., MSWD decreasing as much as 80%). We also demonstrate that thermal annealing significantly reduces the scatter of the trace element data in zircon, yet they preserve the primary characteristics (such as REE anomalies, Hf isotopes, igneous fluctuations and differences in overgrowth composition). This method allows the production of more accurate U-Pb ages, but also has implication for petrogenesis and geothermometry studies. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available