4.6 Article

Four loss estimates for the Gorkha M7.8 earthquake, April 25, 2015, before and after it occurred

Journal

NATURAL HAZARDS
Volume 86, Issue -, Pages 141-150

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-016-2648-7

Keywords

Earthquake risk; Gorkha 2015 earthquake; Nepal seismic risk

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The number of fatalities in the Gorkha M7.8 earthquake of April 25, 2015, has been estimated at four different times as follows. In March 2005, the fatality estimate in this journal was 21,000-42,000 with an assumed magnitude of 8.1 (Wyss in Nat Hazard 34:305-314, 2005). Within hours after this earthquake, the estimated number of fatalities by QLARM was 2000-10,000 using a point source model and M7.9. Four hours later, the estimate was 20,000-100,000, based on a first approximation line source model and assuming children were in school. Children out of school, as this was a weekend day, reduced the fatalities by approximately a factor of two, but was not taken into account for the calculation. The final line source estimates based on M7.8 and M7.9 calculates 800-9300 and 1100-11,200 fatalities, respectively. The official count is about 10,000 fatalities. These estimates were performed using QLARM, a computer tool and world data set on the distribution of people in settlements and containing a model of the buildings present. It is argued here that the loss estimate 10 years before the event being within a factor of 2.1 of the eventual loss count is useful for mitigation planning. With varying quality of information on the source and the attenuation, the estimates of fatalities shortly after the earthquake are accurate enough to be useful for first responders. With full knowledge of the rupture properties and the regional attenuation of seismic waves, the numbers of human losses are estimated correctly.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available