4.6 Article

Robust design of optimal solvents for chemical reactions-A combined experimental and computational strategy

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE
Volume 137, Issue -, Pages 613-625

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2015.07.010

Keywords

Computer-aided molecular design (CAMD); Reaction solvent design; Design under uncertainty; Quantitative structure-property relationship (QSPR); Conductor-like screening model (COSMO)

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)
  2. International Max Planck Research School (IMPRS) for Advanced Methods in Process and System Engineering (Magdeburg)
  3. Max Planck Society in Germany for the Max Planck Partner Group at the East China University of Science and Technology in Shanghai

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Solvents can have significant effects on chemical reactions, however, their huge number makes the selection very difficult and costly. This work presents a systematic method for the design of reaction solvents. Kinetic models are built by correlating experimentally determined reaction rate constants in a small set of known solvents with corresponding solvent theoretical descriptors determined from quantum chemical calculations. Optimal solvents are then identified from the solution of an optimization-based molecular design problem. Besides the deterministic optimization, a robust solvent design framework is proposed to identify solvents that possess the best reaction performance under model uncertainties. The methodology is exemplified for a competitive Diels-Alder reaction with the objective of maximizing the production of the desired product relative to that of the byproduct. Compared to the best experimentally identified solvent, a 10.9% improvement in reaction performance can be achieved with our designed solvent. It is proven that the proposed method is an efficient tool for fast identification of high-performance solvents for chemical reactions. Moreover, it potentially promotes the development of new solvents. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available