4.0 Article

Exploring Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Decision Making Through Mother and Adolescent Dyad Interviews

Journal

FAMILIES SYSTEMS & HEALTH
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

EDUCATIONAL PUBLISHING FOUNDATION-AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1037/fsh0000845

Keywords

adolescence; health behavior; qualitative methods; sexual health

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to explore the factors that influence parents and their adolescent children's decision-making about the HPV vaccine and provide guidance for future interventions. The study found that factors such as background knowledge, values, historical experiences, parenting style, and opinion weights all play a role in decision-making. Interventions, strategies, and tools informed by these factors can support meaningful, mutual decision-making between parents and adolescents, and promote adolescent autonomy and self-sufficiency in health decision-making.
Introduction: The purpose of our research was to explore how parents and their adolescent children make decisions about the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, and to inform future interventions that aim to facilitate inclusive decision-making processes. Method: Purposive and snowball sampling strategies targeted parents and their adolescent children (ages = 11-13) in a large city in Australia. We conducted separate and joint semistructured interviews in 2013 with six mother-adolescent dyads (50% female adolescents and 50% male). Interviews were analyzed using a grounded theory approach. Results: Factors that both facilitate and impede decision making emerged, including: background knowledge, values, historical experiences, parenting style, and opinion weights. Discussion: New interventions, strategies, and tools that are informed by these decision-making factors can be used to aid productive, mutual decision making between parents and adolescents and support adolescent autonomy and self-sufficiency in health decision making.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available