4.5 Review

The status of Hořava gravity

Journal

EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL PLUS
Volume 138, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1140/epjp/s13360-023-04593-y

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Horava gravity is a proposal for a UV completion of gravitation by introducing a preferred foliation in space-time manifold. It provides a power-counting renormalizable theory without ghosts, although it breaks local Lorentz invariance and diffeomorphism invariance. This updated review discusses the successes and challenges of the proposal, focusing on the UV regime, low-energy phenomenology, and phenomena induced by higher derivatives.
Horava gravity is a proposal for a UV completion of gravitation obtained by endowing the space-time manifold with a preferred foliation in space-like hypersurfaces. This allows for a power-counting renormalizable theory free of ghosts, at the cost of breaking local Lorentz invariance and diffeomorphism invariance down to foliation preserving transformations. In this updated review, we report the main successes and challenges of the proposal, discussing the main features of the projectable and non-projectable versions of Horava gravity. We focus in three main aspects: (i) the UV regime, discussing the renormalizability and renormalization group flow of the projectable theory, as well as the obstacles toward similar results in the non-projectable case; (ii) the low-energy phenomenology of both models, including the PN regime, the most updated constraints in the parameter space of the theory, the structure of black holes at low energies, and the possibility of dark matter emerging from gravitational dynamics in the projectable model; and (iii) the specific phenomena induced by higher derivatives, such as the possibility of regularizing singularities, the dynamical behavior of solutions to dispersive equations, and the emission of Hawking radiation by universal horizons.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available