4.2 Article

Operational efficiency for container terminal operators with undesirable outputs: slacks-based measures

Journal

TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/03081060.2023.2264277

Keywords

Operational efficiency; Slacks-Based Measures; container terminals; work accidents; air emissions; container terminal operators

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article discusses the operational efficiency in the container terminal industry and proposes a model to estimate the efficiency by considering CO2 emissions and work accidents as undesirable outputs. The validity of the model is empirically studied using CTOs in a specific port. The results provide insights for improving operational efficiency and offer a scientific framework for evaluating CTOs in ports.
Operational efficiency is crucial in the container terminal industry to reduce costs, increase throughput, enhance customer satisfaction, optimize the supply chain, improve safety, minimize environmental impact, and ensure adaptability and resilience in a dynamic and competitive market. The article aims to estimate operational efficiency for CTOs by the Slacks-Based Measures (SBM) model when considering CO2 emissions and work accidents as undesirable outputs. In doing so, this paper adopted the cluster analysis to select homogeneous CTOs acting as Decision-making Units (DMUs). CTOs in the Cai Mep-Thi Vai port (the CMTV case) were then empirically studied to verify the validity of the suggested model. The results could have real-world applications for CTOs looking for managerial actions to boost operational efficiency and maintain high-quality growth. Additionally, the research model may provide an analytical reference for relevant port management applications. In particular, this study offers CTOs a scientific framework for evaluating the operational efficiency of CTOs located in a port.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available