3.9 Article

Injuries and Overuse Syndromes in Rink Hockey Players

Journal

SPORTVERLETZUNG-SPORTSCHADEN
Volume 37, Issue 3, Pages 141-147

Publisher

GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG
DOI: 10.1055/a-2036-8107

Keywords

rink hockey; quad hockey; injuries; concussions; overuse syndrom

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated injuries sustained by 108 German National League rink hockey players. Head injuries were the most frequent type, with player and ball contact being the main causes. Although head injuries were frequent, they did not result in significant time loss compared to other injuries.
Rink Hockey is a high-speed low-contact sport with a widely recognized injury potential. Played with a hard ball by players wearing little or no protective gear, the rates of concussions and head injuries are of high interest. In this study, we reviewed and investigated injuries sustained by 108 German National League rink hockey players. We conducted an epidemiological cross-sectional study to determine sport-specific injuries and injury patterns in female and male rink hockey players. Data were collected by a standardized questionnaire. A total of 108 players participated in the study. The combined rate of injuries were 9.4/1000 athlete exposures. There was no significant difference between injury rates during games and practice. A sexspecific difference was not detected. Head injuries were the most frequent type (20.8 % of all injuries). Concussions made up 7 % of all head injuries with a rate of 0.76/1000 athlete exposure. Ball contact was the cause for 31 % of injuries, while player contact generated 26.2 % of all injuries. High rates of ball-contact-related injuries resulted in time loss and medical consultations. Head injuries were frequent, however did not result in significant time loss as compared to other injuries. The use of protective gear should be recommended.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available