4.7 Article

Deep 3-GHz observations of the Lockman Hole North with the Very Large Array - II. Catalogue and μJy source properties

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 462, Issue 3, Pages 2934-2949

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw1836

Keywords

methods: data analysis; surveys; cosmology: observations; radio continuum: galaxies

Funding

  1. Dunlap Institute
  2. David Dunlap family
  3. University of Toronto
  4. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada
  5. Herschel Extragalactic Legacy Project, HELP
  6. European Commission Research Executive Agency [FP7-SPACE-2013-1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This is the second of two papers describing the observations and source catalogues derived from sensitive 3-GHz images of the Lockman Hole North using the Karl G. Jansky Very Large Array (VLA). We describe the reduction and cataloguing process, which yielded an image with 8 arcsec resolution and instrumental noise of sigma(n) = 1.01 mu Jy beam(-1) rms (before primary-beam corrections) and a catalogue of 558 sources detected above 5 sigma(n). We include details of how we estimate source spectral indices across the 2-GHz VLA bandwidth, finding a median index of -0.76 +/- 0.04. Stacking of source spectra reveals a flattening of spectral index with decreasing flux density. We present a source count derived from the catalogue. We show a traditional count estimate compared with a completely independent estimate made via a P(D) confusion analysis, and find very good agreement. Cross-matches of the catalogue with X-ray, optical, infrared, radio, and redshift catalogues are also presented. The X-ray, optical and infrared data, as well as active galactic nuclei (AGN) selection criteria allow us to classify 10 per cent as radio-loud AGN, 28 per cent as radio-quiet AGN, and 58 per cent as star-forming galaxies, with only 4 per cent unclassified.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available