4.4 Article

TNT and RDX extraction from B explosives

Journal

PROPELLANTS EXPLOSIVES PYROTECHNICS
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/prep.202300204

Keywords

B mixed explosives; molecular simulation; organic solvent

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study used molecular simulation to compute the affinity of toluene, acetone, and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) towards TNT and RDX. Through recovery and separation experiments, TNT and RDX samples were obtained and validated using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The results showed that using toluene for extraction and recovery yielded the highest efficiency and purity.
The recycling of discarded military bombs holds significant importance in improving energy efficiency within the military field. In this study, we employed first-principles calculations (DFT) to compute the affinity of toluene, acetone, and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) towards TNT and RDX, highlighting the solubility differences that enable their effective separation. Furthermore, through recovery and separation experiments, we successfully obtained TNT and RDX samples, which were then characterized using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to experimentally validate the results obtained from molecular simulation experiments. The results revealed that using toluene for the extraction and recovery of TNT and RDX from waste B explosives yielded the highest recovery efficiency and component purity. SEM analysis showed that TNT extracted with toluene exhibited a regular layered surface, while RDX particles demonstrated a more uniform distribution. This study provides a theoretical basis for the separation and recovery of TNT and RDX from waste B explosives using extraction methods, from the perspective of molecular simulation. image

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available