4.6 Article

Purification of Flavonoids from Chinese Bayberry (Morella rubra Sieb. et Zucc.) Fruit Extracts and α-Glucosidase Inhibitory Activities of Different Fractionations

Journal

MOLECULES
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules21091148

Keywords

Morella rubra fruit; alpha-glucosidase inhibitory activity; flavonoid glycosides; purification

Funding

  1. Special Scientific Research Fund of Agricultural Public Welfare Profession of China [201203089]
  2. Program of International Science and Technology Cooperation [2014DFE30050]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chinese bayberry (Morella rubra Sieb. et Zucc.) fruit have a diverse flavonoid composition responsible for the various medicinal activities, including anti-diabetes. In the present study, efficient simultaneous purification of four flavonoid glycosides, i.e., cyanidin-3-O-glucoside (1), myricetin-3-O-rhamnoside (2), quercetin-3-O-galactoside (3), quercetin-3-O-rhamnoside (4), from Chinese bayberry pulp was established by the combination of solid phase extract (SPE) by C18 Sep-Pak((R)) cartridge column chromatography and semi-preparative HPLC (Prep-HPLC), which was followed by HPLC and LC-MS identification. The purified flavonoid glycosides, as well as different fractions of fruit extracts of six bayberry cultivars, were investigated for -glucosidase inhibitory activities. The flavonol extracts (50% methanol elution fraction) of six cultivars showed strong -glucosidase inhibitory activities (IC50 = 15.4-69.5 g/mL), which were higher than that of positive control acarbose (IC50 = 383.2 g/mL). Four purified compounds 1-4 exerted -glucosidase inhibitory activities, with IC50 values of 1444.3 g/mL, 418.8 g/mL, 556.4 g/mL, and 491.8 g/mL, respectively. Such results may provide important evidence for the potential anti-diabetic activity of different cultivars of Chinese bayberry fruit and the possible bioactive compounds involved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available