Effects of duration of follow‐up and lag in data collection on the performance of adaptive clinical trials
Published 2023 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Effects of duration of follow‐up and lag in data collection on the performance of adaptive clinical trials
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
PHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -
Publisher
Wiley
Online
2023-10-14
DOI
10.1002/pst.2342
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Adaptive Designs: Benefits and Cautions for Neurosurgery Trials
- (2022) Aritra Mukherjee et al. World Neurosurgery
- Patient-Important Outcomes Other Than Mortality in Contemporary ICU Trials: A Scoping Review
- (2022) Anders Granholm et al. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
- Restriction of Intravenous Fluid in ICU Patients with Septic Shock
- (2022) Tine S. Meyhoff et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Haloperidol for the Treatment of Delirium in ICU Patients
- (2022) Nina C. Andersen-Ranberg et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Overestimation of benefit when clinical trials stop early: a simulation study
- (2022) Sharon Liu et al. Trials
- An overview of methodological considerations regarding adaptive stopping, arm dropping, and randomization in clinical trials
- (2022) Anders Granholm et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Lower or Higher Oxygenation Targets for Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure
- (2021) Olav L. Schjørring et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Randomised clinical trials in critical care: past, present and future
- (2021) Anders Granholm et al. INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE
- Effect of 12 mg vs 6 mg of Dexamethasone on the Number of Days Alive Without Life Support in Adults With COVID-19 and Severe Hypoxemia
- (2021) et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Contemporary strategies to improve clinical trial design for critical care research: insights from the First Critical Care Clinical Trialists Workshop
- (2020) Michael O. Harhay et al. INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE
- An Overview of Platform Trials with a Checklist for Clinical Readers
- (2020) Jay J.H. Park et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Comparison of response adaptive randomization features in multiarm clinical trials with control
- (2020) Kert Viele et al. PHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS
- Overrunning in clinical trials: some thoughts from a methodological review
- (2020) Ileana Baldi et al. Trials
- Powering Bias and Clinically Important Treatment Effects in Randomized Trials of Critical Illness
- (2020) Darryl Abrams et al. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
- “Paying the Piper”: The Downstream Implications of Manipulating Sample Size Assumptions for Critical Care Randomized Control Trials*
- (2020) Brian H. Cuthbertson et al. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
- Using simulation studies to evaluate statistical methods
- (2019) Tim P. Morris et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- Perioperative haemodynamic therapy for major gastrointestinal surgery: the effect of a Bayesian approach to interpreting the findings of a randomised controlled trial
- (2019) Elizabeth G Ryan et al. BMJ Open
- Randomised trials with provision for early stopping for benefit (or harm): The impact on the estimated treatment effect
- (2019) S.D. Walter et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- When to keep it simple – adaptive designs are not always useful
- (2019) James M. S. Wason et al. BMC Medicine
- Comparison of methods for control allocation in multiple arm studies using response adaptive randomization
- (2019) Kert Viele et al. Clinical Trials
- Adaptive designs in clinical trials: why use them, and how to run and report them
- (2018) Philip Pallmann et al. BMC Medicine
- Pantoprazole in Patients at Risk for Gastrointestinal Bleeding in the ICU
- (2018) Mette Krag et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Quantifying over-estimation in early stopped clinical trials and the “freezing effect” on subsequent research
- (2016) Hao Wang et al. Clinical Trials
- Statistical controversies in clinical research: scientific and ethical problems with adaptive randomization in comparative clinical trials
- (2015) P. Thall et al. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY
- Clinical trialist perspectives on the ethics of adaptive clinical trials: a mixed-methods analysis
- (2015) Laurie J Legocki et al. BMC Medical Ethics
- Are outcome-adaptive allocation trials ethical?
- (2015) Spencer Phillips Hey et al. Clinical Trials
- Outcomes and Statistical Power in Adult Critical Care Randomized Trials
- (2014) Michael O. Harhay et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
- Outcome-Adaptive Randomization: Is It Useful?
- (2010) Edward L. Korn et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Become a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get StartedAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started