4.2 Review

Why and how is photovoice used as a decolonising method for health research with Indigenous communities in the United States and Canada? A scoping review

Journal

NURSING INQUIRY
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nin.12605

Keywords

community-based participatory research; decolonisation; Indigenous populations; North America; photovoice; scoping review

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study conducted a literature review on the use of photovoice in addressing Indigenous health inequalities, suggesting that it should be incorporated into a broader participatory and decolonising research paradigm. Additionally, more resources are needed to support the involvement of Indigenous people in the research process.
Globally, including in North America, Indigenous populations have poorer health than non-Indigenous populations. This health disparity results from inequality and marginalisation associated with colonialism. Photovoice is a community-based participatory research method that amplifies the voices of research participants. Why and how photovoice has been used as a decolonising method for addressing Indigenous health inequalities has not been mapped. A scoping review of the literature on photovoice for Indigenous health research in the United States and Canada was carried out. Five electronic databases and the grey literature were searched, with no time limit. A total of 215 titles and abstracts and 97 full texts were screened resulting in 57 included articles. Analysis incorporated Lalita Bharadwaj's Framework For Building Research Partnerships with First Nations Communities. Photovoice was selected to improve knowledge mobilisation and participant empowerment and engagement. Studies incorporated relationship building, meaningful data collection, and public dissemination but had a lesser focus on the inclusion of Indigenous peer researchers or participant involvement in analysis. For photovoice to truly realise its decolonising potential, it must be incorporated into a broader participatory and decolonising research paradigm. In addition, more resources are required to support the involvement of Indigenous people in the research process.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

Article Environmental Sciences

Evaluation of an Access-Risk-Knowledge (ARK) Platform for Governance of Risk and Change in Complex Socio-Technical Systems

Nick McDonald, Lucy McKenna, Rebecca Vining, Brian Doyle, Junli Liang, Marie E. Ward, Pernilla Ulfvengren, Una Geary, John Guilfoyle, Arwa Shuhaiber, Julio Hernandez, Mary Fogarty, Una Healy, Christopher Tallon, Rob Brennan

Summary: The key challenges to implementing a whole-system approach to process improvement in health systems include the complexity of socio-technical activity, the capacity for purposeful change, and the ability to proactively manage and govern the system. The deployment and evaluation of the ARK Platform in three healthcare organizations showed positive feedback on its effectiveness in supporting HCAI risk management, although concerns about usability were highlighted.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH (2021)

No Data Available