4.7 Article

Phylogenetic evidence for a new species of Barbus in the Danube River basin

Journal

MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS AND EVOLUTION
Volume 96, Issue -, Pages 187-194

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2015.11.023

Keywords

Cyt b; ATPase 6/8; Act-2; Barbus biharicus; Biharian barbel; Cyprinidae

Funding

  1. European Union
  2. European Social Fund
  3. European Social Fund [TAMOP 4.2.4. A/2-11-1-2012-0001]
  4. State of Hungary
  5. [TAMOP-4.2.2/B-10/1-2010-0024]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Three species of small-sized rheophilic Barbus fishes are endemic to and widely distributed throughout the mountain regions in the Danube River basin. In Hungary, barbels referred to as B. petenyi occur in streams in the foothills of the Carpathians near the borders with Slovakia, Ukraine and Romania. However, up to now, no genetic investigations were carried out on rheophilic barbels in this region. This study aims to clarify the taxonomic identity and distribution of the rheophilic barbels in the Hungarian plain based on molecular and morphological analyses. Two mitochondria! genes (cytochrome b, ATPase 6/8) and one nuclear gene (beta-actin intron 2) were sequenced and several morphometric and meristic characters were recorded. Phylogenetic and morphological analyses revealed that there are four genetically distinct lineages among the rheophilic barbels in the Carpathian Basin. The results demonstrated that North Hungarian Barbus populations belong to B. carpathicus and that B. petenyi presumably does not occur in Hungary. As expected, B. balcanicus was only recorded in samples from the Balkans analyzed for reference. A distinct species, new to science, was discovered to be present in Sebes-Koros River (Crisul Repede) in eastern Hungary and western Romania and is formally described here as B. biharicus Antal, Laszlo, Kotlik - sp. nov. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available