4.4 Article

Translational argument technology: Engineering a step change in the argument web

Journal

JOURNAL OF WEB SEMANTICS
Volume 77, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.websem.2023.100786

Keywords

Argumentation; Argument analytics; Argument mining; Argument technology; Argument web; Debate technology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

j.lawrence@dundee.ac.uk

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

Editorial Material Multidisciplinary Sciences

Argument technology for debating with humans

Chris Reed

NATURE (2021)

Editorial Material Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence

Selected papers from the COMMA 2018 workshops Argumentation & Society and Argumentation & Philosophy

Katie Atkinson, Jacky Visser

ARGUMENT & COMPUTATION (2021)

Article Linguistics

Questions in argumentative dialogue

Annette Hautli-Janisz, Katarzyna Budzynska, Conor McKillop, Brian Pluss, Valentin Gold, Chris Reed

Summary: This paper explores the relationship between linguistics and pragmatics in terms of question structure and context in argumentative discourse. The study demonstrates that different types of questions directly impact the structure of arguments, and challenges previous assumptions about the consequences of non-canonical questions.

JOURNAL OF PRAGMATICS (2022)

Article Communication

From fallacies to semi-fake news: Improving the identification of misinformation triggers across digital media

Elena Musi, Chris Reed

Summary: This study examines the phenomenon of fake news during the pandemic through the lens of critical thinking. It addresses the lack of systematic criteria for fact-checking misinformation in the gray area. By drawing from fallacy theory, the study identifies 10 fallacious strategies that flag misinformation and provides a deterministic analysis method for recognizing them.

DISCOURSE & SOCIETY (2022)

Article Linguistics

Conventional Implicatures in Argumentation

Annette Hautli-Janisz, Katarzyna Budzynska, Chris Reed

Summary: In this paper, the authors discuss the conventional implicatures (cis) as an interesting phenomenon in the field of semantics, pragmatics, and argumentation. They extend an existing model for argument diagramming to incorporate this implicit meaning and show that cis differ from enthymemes, making them more suitable for argument analysis. By bringing the conventionally implicated material to the surface, the authors are able to explore the interplay between conventional implicature and argumentation, shedding new light on the relationship between meaning and argumentation.

LANGUAGES (2023)

Article History & Philosophy Of Science

Argumentum Ad Alia: argument structure of arguing about what others have said

Katarzyna Budzynska, Chris Reed

Summary: This paper argues that expertise, authority, and testimony play crucial roles in communication and cognition. It recognizes various forms of persuasion, including the appeals to position to know, witness testimony, expert opinion, and authority. The paper further demonstrates that analyzing these types of arguments requires considering speech activities and communication strategies such as using others' words, attacking statements, and reasoning from others' reasoning.

SYNTHESE (2023)

Proceedings Paper Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications

QT30: A Corpus of Argument and Conflict in Broadcast Debate

Annette Hautli-Janisz, Zlata Kikteva, Wassiliki Siskou, Kamila Gorska, Ray Becker, Chris Reed

Summary: Broadcast political debate is crucial for democracy as it provides the general public with easy access to opinions that shape policies. QT30 is the largest corpus of analysed broadcast political debate, featuring 30 episodes of BBC's 'Question Time' from 2020 and 2021. The resource utilizes Inference Anchoring Theory to annotate the creation and reaction of arguments and conflicts in dialogical settings.

LREC 2022: THIRTEEN INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON LANGUAGE RESOURCES AND EVALUATION (2022)

Article Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence

Classifying Argumentative Relations Using Logical Mechanisms and Argumentation Schemes

Yohan Jo, Seojin Bang, Chris Reed, Eduard Hovy

Summary: While current research on argument mining lacks a comprehensive understanding of the logical mechanisms that constitute argumentative relations, this study attempts to classify argumentative relations based on four logical and theory-informed mechanisms, achieving better results than unsupervised baselines.

TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS (2021)

Article Logic

THE WALTONIAN FOUNDATIONS OF ARGUMENT TECHNOLOGY

Chris Reed

JOURNAL OF APPLIED LOGICS-IFCOLOG JOURNAL OF LOGICS AND THEIR APPLICATIONS (2021)

Article Communication

Annotating Argument Schemes

Jacky Visser, John Lawrence, Chris Reed, Jean Wagemans, Douglas Walton

Summary: Argument schemes are essential abstractions for understanding argumentative communication. Annotated corpora of argumentative discourse are limited, particularly in terms of argument scheme corpora. By extending existing annotated corpora and proposing improvements in annotation guidelines, this paper contributes to a better understanding of argumentation in communicative practice.

ARGUMENTATION (2021)

No Data Available