4.6 Article

The humoral response to COVID-19 vaccinations can predict the booster effect on health care workers-toward personalized vaccinations?

Journal

JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdad198

Keywords

antibodies; booster; humoral response; SARS-COV-2; vaccine effectiveness

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The humoral response to the first two doses of the COVID-19 vaccine can predict the response to the booster vaccine. In this study, low antibody levels 1 month after the second vaccine and a rapid decline in antibodies were independent predictors of low antibody response to the booster vaccine.
Background Waning immunity after the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccinations creates the constant need of boosters. Predicting individual responses to booster vaccines can help in its timely administration. We hypothesized that the humoral response to the first two doses of the BNT162b2 vaccine can predict the response to the booster vaccine.Methods A prospective cohort of hospital health care workers (HCW) that received three doses of the BNT162b2 vaccine. Participants completed serological tests at 1 and 6 months after the second vaccine dose and 1 month after the third. We analyzed predictive factors of antibody levels after the booster using multivariate regression analyses.Results From 289 eligible HCW, 89 (31%) completed the follow-up. Mean age was 48 (+/- 10) and 46 (52%) had daily interaction with patients. The mean (+/- standard deviation) antibody level 1 month after the second vaccine was 223 (+/- 59) AU/ml, and 31 (35%) had a rapid antibody decline (>50%) in 6 months. Low antibody levels 1 month after the second vaccine and a rapid antibody decline were independent predictors of low antibody levels after the booster vaccine.Conclusions The characteristics of the humoral response to COVID-19 vaccinations show promise in predicting the humoral response to the booster vaccines.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available